We co-build new business with corporates — and invest in what we build together. Not a vendor for your next chapter. A partner in it.
35
Ventures founded
>€1B
Enterprise value created
5
Exits realised
>20
Years of operating history
Introduction Deck · 2026Munich · New York · Singapore
02 / 18
The Hard Truth
Your core market is flat. New business is the only way out — and your own structure is built to stop it.
Innovation isn't failing because the technology is weak. It's failing because there's no system designed to turn breakthrough technology into real business outside the structures that constrain it.
84%
of executives say innovation is crucial
McKinsey Global Innovation Survey
6%
are satisfied with innovation performance
Same survey. Same executives.
90%
of corporate innovation labs fail
CB Insights / McKinsey aggregated data
Section 1 · The Problemmantro.net
03 / 18
Why Most Paths Break Down
Each established route to new business has a structural limit.
There's nothing wrong with any of these paths in isolation. The challenge is that none of them are designed to take a venture all the way to operating company.
Strategy Consultancies
Built to advise. Designed to hand off.
The strongest firms in the world produce excellent strategy and validated concepts. Execution responsibility, founding-team design, and long-term operational stewardship sit outside their delivery model.
Internal Innovation Labs
Built to protect the core. Asked to disrupt it.
Internal labs are structurally optimised for the parent's KPIs and budget cycle. They produce strong ideas, but the same governance that protects the core also slows the new.
Corporate VCs
Capital is in place. Deal flow has to come from somewhere.
CVCs invest in formed companies. They typically don't have a mechanism to generate proprietary deal flow from their own R&D, so they compete for the same external rounds as everyone else.
Digital Agencies
Strong delivery. Different incentive structure.
Agencies bill for hours and ship features. The contract ends when the work is delivered — long before the question "did this become a real business?" can be answered.
Section 1 · The Problemmantro.net
04 / 18
The Golden Triangle
When Technology,
Building & Capital
converge — ventures scale.
Historically these three forces operate in isolation. Technology lives inside R&D. Building expertise lives in venture builders. Capital lives in funds.
We don't advise across the triangle. We operate all three nodes — under one roof, with shared economics.
Section 2 · The Positioningmantro.net
05 / 18
The Structural Difference
Not a consultancy claiming to build.
Not a VC claiming to add value. We operate.
vs. Consultancies
We don't advise on venture building. We take full execution responsibility — team, product, go-to-market, governance.
When the engagement ends, our 80-person platform stays — through scaling and beyond. The team that designs the strategy is the team that ships the product.
vs. Venture Studios
We don't just build MVPs from scratch. We build ventures from corporate R&D and research IP — carve-outs that need real engineering muscle.
And we invest. The combination of corporate-grade delivery, deep tech literacy, and capital is what makes the model work end-to-end.
vs. VCs
We don't evaluate formed ventures. We create them — and then back the ones that fit our fund's thesis.
Our deal flow is proprietary because we built it. Where the fit is right we lead; where it isn't, we syndicate warmly to peers.
Section 2 · The Positioningmantro.net
06 / 18
By the Numbers
Founded means companies with cap tables and customers — not workshop deliverables.
20 yrs
Operating history
Through three economic cycles and two tech revolutions.
35
Ventures founded
Legal entities. Cap tables. Teams. Customers. Equity skin in the game.
>€1B
Enterprise value created
Across the portfolio. 5 exits realised.
400+
Enterprise tech projects
The heritage that built the delivery discipline and corporate networks.
80+
People on platform
60% technologists. Munich HQ + Zagreb & Trnava delivery hubs.
GP
Capital access via Talos
We sit as one of the GPs in Talos Capital. Lead capability for venture-mode rounds when the venture fits the fund's thesis.
Section 2 · The Positioningmantro.net
07 / 18
Operating Principle
Market first. Technology second.
The dominant failure mode in deep tech and corporate innovation is the same: build the thing, then look for the market. We invert the sequence. We don't build ventures around technologies — we build ventures around markets that technologies can unlock.
→ 01
Identify use cases
Where is the willingness to pay? Which customer pain is worth solving?
→ 02
Define MVP capability
The minimum technical capability the venture actually needs — nothing more.
→ 03
Validate willingness to pay
Real customers, real commitments. Before engineering scales anything.
→ 04
Build the venture thesis
Founding team, IP structure, equity design, milestone sequencing.
→ 05
Then scale the technology
Capital follows evidence, not optimism. Commitment scales as risk drops.
Section 3 · The Approachmantro.net
08 / 18
AI as Operating Layer
AI doesn't just power the ventures we build. It powers how we build them.
Every venture we run today is designed AI-native from day one. More importantly, the building process itself runs on AI — validation cycles compress, operations run lean, and the same 80-person platform delivers more, faster.
→ Validation
AI-augmented market signal
Customer-discovery cycles compressed from weeks to days. Hypothesis testing at scale. Faster path to evidence of willingness-to-pay.
→ Architecture
AI-native by default
Every new venture is designed AI-first — workflow automation, intelligent products, agentic operations baked in from the architectural sketch.
→ Operations
Agents inside the venture
Ventures run with structurally lower headcount. AI agents handle routine ops — Helpify and Praxero both ship with agents in the workflow on day one.
→ Capital
A vertical AI thesis
Talos Capital — the fund we co-GP — invests where building expertise and AI vertical depth converge. Capital deployed where we have operating edge.
Section 3 · The Approachmantro.net
09 / 18
Two Models, One Platform
We build ventures. Where they end up depends on the strategic intent.
Model One
Corporate Venture Building
For: Corporates with strategic intent for a new business — when the product still needs to be built.
Strategic intent comes from the corporate. We build the entire new business — product, team, market — from the ground up, as an independent entity funded via convertible loan.
Starting point
Strategic intent from the corporate
Build
Product, team, market — from the ground up
Capital
Convertible loan · off-balance-sheet · governed not run
Outcome → a sustainable new company with a real reason to exist — your M&A target of the future, at EBITDA multiples.
Model Two
Technology Transfer
For: Corporates with stranded R&D — and research institutions whose IP needs a venture, not a license.
Existing technology comes from corporate R&D or a research institution. We structure the carve-out, build the company around it, install the founding team, and bring in external capital.
Starting point
Existing technology · IP · technical founders
Build
A venture around the tech that already exists
Capital
External VCs lead · Talos may follow when thesis fits
Outcome → a sustainable new company with a real reason to exist — independent, venture-backed. Your IP, finally a business.
Section 3 · The Approachmantro.net
10 / 18
Four Service Lines
How the platform shows up. Two strategic models. Four ways to engage.
→ 01
Corporate Business Creation
Building new revenue streams as separate, independently operated companies for established corporates. The full Model One execution — from sandbox to acquired business.
Anchor for Model One · Corporate Venture Building
→ 02
Venture Building & Scaling
Taking technology or strategic intent from zero to funded company. Structured venture creation, founding-team installation, and operational support through growth stages.
Anchor for Model Two · Technology Transfer
→ 03
Digital Product & Tech Development
The 80-person engineering platform — product, design, software, hardware. The delivery muscle that powers every venture, available as a standalone capability for corporate partners.
Heritage capability · 400+ projects shipped
→ 04
Process Innovation & Business Scaling
Operational transformation for the scale-up moment — process redesign, AI-augmented workflows, and operational architecture for organisations ready to step into the next stage.
Operating layer · AI-native by default
Section 3 · The Approachmantro.net
11 / 18
Model One · Deep Dive
Corporate Venture Building
Build your M&A target of the future.
Externally built. Performance-validated. Then acquired at market rates. The CFO's favourite kind of venture.
01
Sandbox · 8–12 weeks
Opportunity validation — market sizing, first customer conversations, technical feasibility, business model hypothesis. Gate decision before any commitment.
02
Incubation · 6–12 months
Product-market fit. MVP, first pilots, revenue validation, team build-out. Capital follows evidence of traction — not roadmaps.
03
Scaling · ongoing
Full team, product maturity, recurring revenue. The business transitions from startup mode to operating business — ready for conversion and acquisition.
Why this structure
Because the corporate's own structure is built to protect the core — and the new business needs to be built outside it. Governance veto stays with the corporate, daily decisions stay with the people running the venture.
Conversion valuation is performance-based. The better mantro builds, the more it's worth — and the more the corporate pays for it. But they pay for proven value, not venture optimism.
Why the CFO likes it
No open-ended R&D commitment. Off-balance-sheet via convertible loan. Defined capital gates. Acquisition priced like an M&A transaction — at EBITDA multiples, not venture premiums.
Section 3 · The Approachmantro.net
12 / 18
Model Two · Deep Dive
Technology Transfer
Turn stranded technology into investable ventures.
95% of patents never become companies. Not because the science is weak — because the business was never built.
Incorporate the entity. Execute IP licensing. Close the funding round. Install the founding team. Launch with governance in place.
The structure
Technology originates from corporate R&D or research institutions. Goal: an independent, externally funded company.
The technology source retains a minority equity stake — full upside, none of the operational burden. We co-invest 50% of the venture-building costs from day one. Real skin in the game from the build phase onwards.
Why this works
We're builders and investors. The fund we co-GP can follow on when the venture fits the thesis — so the cap-table partner stays operationally engaged through growth, not just economically attached at the start.
Section 3 · The Approachmantro.net
13 / 18
The Capital Layer
We're builders. We're also GPs in a venture fund.
Talos Capital is a vertical AI venture fund where mantro sits as one of the general partners. When a venture we've built fits the fund's thesis — and is in venture mode rather than a corporate build — we have the option to lead the first institutional round. Where the fit isn't right, we syndicate warmly to peer-level VCs on an eye-to-eye basis.
Source
Corporate Partners & Research
Strategic intent, stranded IP, and research breakthroughs feed both models.
→
Build → Lead
mantro Studio + Talos GP role
Builders here. Co-GPs in Talos there. Lead capacity when a venture fits the fund's thesis and is in venture mode.
→
Scale
External VCs & Syndicates
Peer-level syndication. Warm intros to Series A leads — never cold outreach.
Two important nuances: corporate venture builds aren't Talos investments — they're funded by the corporate via convertible loan. And the fund leads only where the thesis fits. Where it doesn't, your venture still benefits from peer-level VC syndication routes that most studios can't access.
Section 4 · The Capital Layermantro.net
14 / 18
Proof in Market
Proof. Not promises.
Four ventures across both models — live in market, generating real revenue, building real companies.
Corporate Venture Building
termios
LEG · Oventrop
Deep tech build — custom IoT thermostat + AI-powered SaaS for portfolio-scale heating. Hardware certified, multiple patents filed.
Sector
Real estate · PropTech · CleanTech
Tech
Custom IoT hardware · multiple patents · AI SaaS
Stage
Scaling · external fundraise underway
€10M+
Corporate investment to date
Corporate Venture Building
Helpify
BSH (Bosch Hausgeräte)
AI-powered repair brokerage & self-help platform. Transforming after-sales from cost centre to growth engine.
Sector
Consumer goods · After-sales · Platform
Stage
Live in market · growing fast
Tech
AI diagnostics · marketplace · agents
>€1M
Revenue in <6 months
Corporate Venture Building
Praxero
MLP
AI-powered BPO for medical practices. A new revenue stream built on top of a captive professional network.
Sector
Healthcare-adjacent · Professional services
Stage
Incubation · live MVP · pilots running
Tech
LLM workflows · AI agents · BPO ops
3–6 mo
Engagement to live MVP
Technology Transfer
EdiMembre
Merck / MilliporeSigma
Proprietary edible membrane carved out of corporate R&D into a US venture. Lab to funded company in ~6 months.
Sector
Food tech · Bio-manufacturing
Stage
Post-formation · partnerships live
Geography
German IP → US entity (cross-border)
€700K
Pre-seed round closed
Section 5 · The Proofmantro.net
15 / 18
Trusted By
Built with the companies that shape European industry.
Twenty years of corporate relationships across automotive, industry, consumer goods, insurance, finance, energy, and life sciences.
Section 5 · The Proofmantro.net
16 / 18
Global Delivery Model
German engineering. Global reach.
We centralise delivery for quality. We distribute presence for proximity. Munich is where strategy and leadership live. Zagreb and Trnava are where products get built. New York and Singapore keep us close to capital and to research.
Section 6 · The Platformmantro.net
17 / 18
Designed For Your Organisation
Innovation fails when it's designed for one stakeholder.
Our model is designed for all of them. The CFO's concern, the CEO's optionality, the CTO's IP integrity, and the BU lead's positioning — all explicit, all addressed by structure.
CEO & Boardstrategic optionality, controlled risk
Governance veto on major decisions. No operational distraction. Asymmetric risk/reward — limited commitment, venture equity appreciation. You're building your M&A target without paying the M&A premium.
CFOwhat does it cost — what does it return?
Capital-efficient through convertible loans. Off-balance-sheet. Market-based valuation at acquisition — standard EBITDA multiples tied to actual performance, not venture premiums. Defined capital commitment at each gate.
CTO & R&Ddoes my IP stay protected?
Clear licensing frameworks. Continued collaboration where it makes sense. Technology integrity preserved through structured IP transfer — not abandoned to a vendor.
BU Leadersis this a threat or an opportunity?
Built complementary — outside the structures that would constrain it. The new venture doesn't compete for the same budget cycle, the same talent pool, or the same KPI sheet.
Section 6 · The Platformmantro.net
18 / 18
From Entrepreneurs. For Enterprises.
Innovation begins with a conversation.
Let's continue ours.
We build new business from breakthrough technology — and invest in what we build. If something in this deck resonated with where you're trying to take your organisation, the next step is simple: send a reply.